A pending federal budget bill includes a provision imposing a 10-year moratorium that would block any state or local law regulating artificial intelligence (AI) or automated decision-making – unless such a law explicitly promotes AI’s deployment. The bill defines AI so broadly that it covers virtually any automated system – from facial recognition to generative AI – including algorithms used in hiring, housing, or public benefits decisions. This move would effectively freeze state-level AI oversight for the next decade.
Impact on State Policy Innovation and Industry
Many states have raced to set their own AI rules. Some have already enacted notable measures – for example, New York City’s new bias-audit law for hiring algorithms would likely become unenforceable if the federal ban passes.
Proponents say the pause will prevent a patchwork of conflicting state regulations and give Congress time to craft uniform standards. Major tech firms have lobbied for a single federal framework to avoid high compliance costs across states.
Civil Rights and Consumer Concerns
Opponents argue the plan creates “preemption without protection,” removing local guardrails without replacing them. They warn this would leave AI-related harms unchecked and call the proposal a “giant gift to Big Tech,” saying it lets companies ignore privacy safeguards and allows deepfakes to spread.
Federalism and Legal Challenges
The sweeping ban raises federalism concerns, as states may challenge it in court as an overreach of their authority.
Existing Federal Safeguards
Even if states are sidelined, certain AI-related harms remain actionable under federal law:
- Discrimination: Core civil rights laws like Title VII and the Fair Housing Act still ban biased outcomes even if AI is involved. Companies can face liability for algorithmic discrimination.
- Consumer Protection: The FTC warns that deceptive AI can violate consumer protection laws – it recently penalized a company for misusing facial recognition tech.
Conclusion
This debate spotlights a trade-off between fostering innovation and protecting the public. The moratorium would simplify the landscape for industry but also sideline state-level protections. How policymakers resolve this tension will shape the future of AI governance in the US.
#AI #TechPolicy #CivilRights #Innovation #Federalism
👉 Contact a Galkin Law attorney to discuss your AI legal issues
hashtagAI hashtagTechPolicy hashtagCivilRights hashtagInnovation hashtagFederalism hashtagBigTech hashtagLinkedInPolicyDebate