On February 7, 2025, Representatives Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) and Darin LaHood (R-IL) introduced the “No DeepSeek on Government Devices Act.” The legislation targets the Chinese AI application DeepSeek, seeking to prohibit its use on federal devices due to concerns over data security and potential espionage risks. While the bill reflects rare bipartisan alignment on national security issues, questions remain about its implementation, unintended consequences, and likelihood of passage.

The Case for Banning DeepSeek

DeepSeek’s Chinese origins have sparked fears that the platform could be used for surveillance or disinformation campaigns. Proponents argue that preemptively barring it from government networks would reduce vulnerabilities and set a precedent for evaluating AI tools in sensitive environments. This move echoes prior efforts to restrict foreign-owned apps deemed security threats, demonstrating a broader trend of increasing scrutiny on foreign technology.

Broader Implications

Although the bill directly targets DeepSeek, its implications extend beyond one application. The legislation signals a shift toward more proactive measures in regulating foreign AI platforms. However, such actions may limit U.S. agencies’ access to cutting-edge analytics or research capabilities if equivalent domestic alternatives are unavailable. Additionally, banning a single app might prompt diplomatic friction with China, potentially affecting broader tech and trade relations.

Challenges to Passage

Even with bipartisan support, the bill’s passage is not guaranteed. Legislative priorities, partisan disputes, and concerns over targeting a single application rather than developing a comprehensive evaluation framework could stall its progress. Some lawmakers may prefer a broader approach to assessing all foreign AI applications rather than singling out DeepSeek.

Outlook and Next Steps

Despite these challenges, the current political environment could favor the bill’s advancement. Bipartisan agreement highlights a shared understanding of national security risks. If supporters can maintain a clear, focused message and avoid adding controversial provisions, the legislation has a strong chance of moving forward.

The introduction of the “No DeepSeek on Government Devices Act” reflects growing concerns over foreign-owned AI platforms and national security. The bill’s future hinges on lawmakers overcoming procedural hurdles and demonstrating a unified, security-first rationale.